The jury has a few questions
Weeks before the Libby jury of nine women and three men gets the case and starts deliberations, the group is actively involved and being heard.
Judge Reggie Walton has given jurors notebooks so they can track the evidence and testimony. The notebooks are kept by the court's clerk.
But beyond the note taking to help prompt their memories later, the judge gives the Libby jurors a chance to pose questions in real time at the end of each witness's testimony. We've seen the flash of white note cards pop up in the jury box as they pass them down to the clerk. Sometimes four or five questions appear. Judge Walton reviews the written questions privately with the attorneys in what's called a "sidebar."
The juror questions that can be posed within the rules of the law are then addressed to the witness by the judge. Potentially this would clear up uncertainties and perhaps improve the deliberative process later.
For example, jurors wanted to know if Ari Fleischer had ever asked Libby if the details about Valerie Wilson were classified. Fleischer testified that Libby told him about Valerie Wilson working at the CIA and that it was "hush, hush." Fleischer then explained, turning toward the jury, that the typical White House practice was to say very clearly, "This is classified," before passing information. Fleischer said Libby had not done that so Fleischer assumed it was not classified.
Earlier, when Libby's CIA briefer Craig Schmall appeared, jurors wanted him to explain the symbols he used in his handwritten notes. They also asked how he knew Libby was "annoyed" about press leaks that might have come from the CIA as Schmall had testified. The witness who saw Libby several times a week said he could tell Libby was "annoyed" based on tone of voice and body language.
Read more from Kelly O'Donnell
Early Nightly is up
TRACKBACKS
Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b0aa69e200d834def06653ef
I like the idea of the jurors being able to ask questions in real time. I have been on a few juries myself over the years and have wanted to ask for clarification of both sides - you made your point but you left a few things out. Or when one side asks for a sidebar and the jury is taken out of the room. I once asked the bailiff who won the sidebar and she said one asking the questions. What?!? No further information forthcoming.
To be able to submit questions and have them answered right away or at the end of the trial would enhance the jury experience.
Dewey Quong, Reno, NV (Sent Jan 30, 2007 10:06:36 PM)
SEND A COMMENT
PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to this post, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.