The week that was at the White House
It's been a rough and tumble week in the White House press room over the Cheney hunting story. Many viewers have written me with praise and plenty of criticism about my questioning of press secretary Scott McClellan. The debate about this story has focused equal parts on my colleagues and me as it has on the unfortunate facts of this hunting accident involving the Vice President.
Let me say at the outset that I was wrong to lose my temper at Scott McClellan. I've worked well with Scott since we first met during the 2000 campaign. Monday, he suggested my aggressive questioning about the disclosure of the hunting accident was a stunt for the cameras. He said this during a morning OFF CAMERA briefing, which undercut his point. Furthermore, I considered it a cheap shot. I said, "Don't be a jerk to me personally, just answer the question." I regret saying that because it's never appropriate to speak that way and because it created a distraction from the issues at hand.
Putting that aside, I do not apologize for asking tough questions about this story. I'm in the business of getting information -- as much of it as possible. The public and I don't always get as much as I think we deserve, but I keep trying. I also try to demand straight answers. Covering politicians, I have to work harder to get them. I have not made any judgments about the facts of this story as it pertains to what happened on the Armstrong ranch. I have stuck to reporting the facts. I do, however feel it's appropriate to push hard for full and immediate disclosure from our country's highest leaders about their conduct -- public and private. My view is, as elected officials with unparalleled influence over the lives of the American people, the President and Vice President owe the public information about their activities. I see myself as a proxy for the public that has raised questions about what happened and why the Vice President did not immediately disclose it. Furthermore, when a sitting Vice President shoots a man, it's a helluva story -- worthy of public notice and discussion. Therefore, I think it's appropriate to question the White House about why the Vice President chose to disregard the President's normal procedures for public disclosure. Mr. Cheney, in my view, acted as if he had something to hide. He also chose to allow a witness to this accident and the White House press secretary to spend three days portraying this as the fault of the shooting victim, Harry Whittington. Wednesday, Mr. Cheney changed course and took the blame. That invites press scrutiny.
This episode was also emblematic of how the Vice President chooses to communicate with the press and by extension the public. It also revealed tension within the White House between the staffs of the President and Vice President.
Yet the debate playing out in the blogosphere, cable airwaves and on talk radio pits the Vice President against an allegedly left-wing, overly cynical, prissy White House press corps in a tizzy because it wasn't the first to know and angry because it hates the President and Vice President anyway. This is nonsense. If you believe an accidental shooting by Vice President Al Gore would not be met with the same press scrutiny, I think you are not being honest with yourself. Have you Googled transcripts from the Clinton administration at the height of the Lewinsky scandal? The pursuit of information at the White House is often tense. We push hard for it. Maybe you think we pushed too hard in this case. Maybe you think there was no grave harm in waiting to learn the facts of this incident for a few days. I can accept that. The way we do our business is not always pretty and we should be accountable for that. I happen to believe, however, on balance, our dogged pursuit of lots of information, all the time, is a good thing. I view the White House press corps as a proxy for the public. It provides fodder for important debates in this country. But then again, I do have a bias: I'm in the information-gathering business.
One final thought. In recent days, some people have suggested to me that the press corps has failed to recognize that this is a sad story. Two friends, one who happened to be the Vice President, were involved in a terrible accident. It could have happened to anyone. Our tough questions and our reporting failed to give that adequate attention. It's a fair point. I do think the Vice President himself helped to give voice to how painful this accident was. That's why I think it was appropriate he decided to discuss it publicly.
Read more from David Gregory
Weekend update
TRACKBACKS
Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b0aa69e200d8345a85ae69e2
What is Really News? As seems so often the case, the news on the shooting accident in which Vice-President Cheney accidentally shot a friend while hunting has become a story about the story. Were now spending our time talking about how the news was collected, and w...
Posted on Feb 18, 2006 1:15:39 PM at:
Threads from Henry's Web
They Can Dish It Out, But They Sure Can't Take It! They can dish it out, but they sure can’t take it! It’s almost funny to watch the familiar scenario unfold, but it happens often enough to be an old joke. Liberals and the media (sorry to be redundant) attack, criticize, denigrate, and even mock the......
Posted on Sep 6, 2006 10:00:20 AM at:
The Valletta Papers
Thank you David Gregory for being there and for asking the tough questions. Do not let this Administration get away with their obvious attempts to distort facts and information. Kudos for the work you do everyday.
Marla Chaz (Sent Feb 21, 2006 2:58:58 PM)
Mr. Gregory,
I do not feel you needed to apologize on Meet The Press for you comments to the White House Press Secretary. Keep asking the tough questions.
Mike Trillo, San Juan Capistrano, CA (Sent Feb 21, 2006 2:56:06 PM)
This may be off-topic and off-network, but wasn't Sam Donaldson known for the phrase "Now hold on a minute Mr. President."? How can we, the American people actually keep track of our elected officials if the press shies away from the 'tough questions'. How do we even begin to manage Dick Cheney's contempt for the general public. The question needed to be asked and McClellan was being anything but forthcoming and was flip and rude to boot. You did the right thing.
LH, Houston, Texas (Sent Feb 21, 2006 2:50:13 PM)
David, I would have never elected you or picked you to be a proxy for me....regardless, of how you inserted yourself into this self-appointed position let me say one thing...."You're fired"!
Anne (Sent Feb 21, 2006 2:14:31 PM)
I am a little late, but I still have to say "You Go, David". As I was watching this exchange with the press and McClellen, the thought that came to mind was "How much to you have to pay a man to sell his soul?". Maybe McClellen thinks he has a great job, but my idea of a great job is not lying and distorting the truth to cover the the deeds of the boss. If he was a man of conviction, he would resign. Again. You go, David. Keep up the good work!
Dianna, NValley, IA (Sent Feb 21, 2006 1:53:29 PM)
These are the same guys who told Helen Thomas, the esteemed White House Press Corp DIVA, to take a back seat in the alcoves. If it hasn't occurred to people, one has to fight for the right to get information which almost takes on the magnitudes of a wrestling brawl with this Bush White House. Which is why David Gregory has earned the esteem of not only his compatriots within the press corp but he has extolled what is required to pull the teeth of truth out of this corroded and corrupted mouth of the Scott McClellan-led White House. Go get 'em, David!
Dave Van Grun (Sent Feb 21, 2006 1:17:13 PM)
Boggle ... David is one of many "Correspondents" who blurs the line between reporter and analyst. Why is David on every MSNBC political show for his opinion? He has diluted his credibility as a reporter by givining his opinion. Report ... don't editorialize or at least change his title to Chief White House ANALYST. Call a spade a spade and be truthful with the American public, if not yourself.
Jamie, Pine City, New York (Sent Feb 21, 2006 1:03:12 PM)
Please keep asking the tough questions. It's essential to democratic health.
NBC- Give this man a raise!
Diana Baker (Sent Feb 21, 2006 1:00:55 PM)
Keep up the good work David. The key to a democracy is a free press that asks the tough questions. Had the press not given this administration a free ride we would probably not be in Iraq. This Administrations agenda is to muzzel the press and run roughshod over the laws and the people until it gets what it wants when it wants it. The only safety valve we have is an inquiring press that keeps things honest.
Marvin Arnpriester, Council Bluffs, IA (Sent Feb 21, 2006 12:18:52 PM)
This is another perfect example of the media's true colors and agenda slipping out again. Dan Rather and the made up Memo's. The 60 Minutes producer calling the Kerry Campaign to let them in on the hatchet job that was coming. And now David Gregory showing his true bias in the White House press room.
After each incident there is an immediate attempt to get the cat back in the bag. Pathetic attempts at explaining why it happened. And claims of "just reporting the fact" and the absence of any agenda. It is so obvious to the average American that you have an agenda. Your attempts to deny it come across as sad and pathetic.
Mike Jacobson, Payson, Utah (Sent Feb 21, 2006 11:56:54 AM)
A lefty reporter gets a hissi-fit if a hated conservative boo man has an accident and informs the pampered White House press-corp not right away, but worries about other things, like taking care of the accident victim (and family) first. And then the guy has the audacity to release the news to the local press. Would the same guy have acted the same way if the same circumstances would apply to a politician of the left? Yeah right ... Can you trust NBC news if their reporters are that openly partisan?
Rob Zoelch (Sent Feb 21, 2006 11:43:44 AM)
a little late on the commentary however, I applaude you in your effort to get to the grit of the matter. as I've read in all the comments you've received, more of your viewing public are 'with ya rather than agin ya'..keep up the good work! this cheny incident is the perfect metaphor for this administration's behavior since it's beginnings.
mary stickels (Sent Feb 21, 2006 11:12:41 AM)
Until reading your article here, I questioned why it was such a big deal that our VP accidentally shot somone. But as you pointed out, we do care about what is going on in the personal lives of our elected officials. That is why we were so upset about Clinton/Lewinsky. So yes, things should have and could have been handled better. But enough is enough!! Let's move on and get on with life. (It does appear that we have a few intelligent people on this blog, but we need "spellcheck" for those who struggle in spelling.)
Jaime Monzana (Sent Feb 21, 2006 11:01:10 AM)
Why did the press say that what Bill Clinton did in his "private life" didn't matter? Now why is so important for us to know what happens in Dick Cheney's private life?
Larry Williams (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:52:11 AM)
Mr. Gregory,
I sent NBC an e-mail as soon as I read about your dust up with McClellan applauding you for being frank and speaking your mind -our mind- when we can't. I loved that encounter and I think you had every right to say what you did considering what McClellan said. That's why I was so disappointed and let down when I heard you had issued an apology. I listened to a litanty of hateful comments during Clinton's years in office that have only been surpassed by what issues forth from the Republicans today, and I never heard or hear any apologies. I really wish you hadn't done that. It doesn't diminish my respect for what you do, but that apology did far more damage to those of us on your side than your comment to McClellan ever did. Keep up the good work.
Geoff Page, San Diego, CA. (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:49:38 AM)
Yes, you need to ask tough questions but you do not need to act like news jackals. Most "reporters" ask really dumb questions. I think to be heard more than anything. The Cheney issue was a flash in the pan. There are more important issues but you guys fail to report much. You seem to be more interested in furthering your career and reputations. Maybe that is why I quit reading newspapers and only read the snippets on the Internet. I don't want your opinion, I just want the facts.
Mike Baltimore Md (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:21:36 AM)
I once considered myself a Democrat, but I am so sick of the politicians and news media always being on a 'witch hunt'. Yes, Republicans do their share, but the DNC and news media seem to 'eat, sleep, live, and breathe it'. Get over yourselves already and do the jobs you have in a such a way as to better our country, not continually destroy and tear down. How can other countries help but hate and disrespect us when there is so much disrespect and loathing within? Between the ACLU, the news media, and the politicians destroying our moral fiber there isn't nearly as much left to honor or be proud of.
Cheney is a man and was on private time. There was an accident. End of story. There was no big story being hidden. It was an accident. They happen to people every day. A quail hunt has nothing to do with the job of being a vice president. Therefore it really doesn't need to be the world's business.
This is like all the digging into people's pasts about what they did or didn't do in college or other such ridiculous unimportant garbage. Do you want to be judged on everything you did or did not do as a young adult? It's what we learned from it and how we turned out that matters. None of us are perfect. So why do you people expect perfection out of imperfect creatures? I wish you would all just shut up already! All I can see out of you (the afore mentioned group) is, "How much evil(real or imagined) can we try to create the appearance of while we try to cloak our own in our arrogance and self-righteousness?" I personally would be more upset if Cheney had been more concerned with telling the news media than with the condition of Mr Whittington.
Trish Zwakenberg (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:13:48 AM)
I am actually sick of the press and the sensationalism that it spreads. Cheney's conduct was private action and therefore it should not be such an issue that it was not released right away. How about reporting some real news, on real issues! It is true that we should know about the conduct of the VP, even if it takes place in his personal life, but because it was delayed a day does not make him a villian. If the tables were turned and it was you in Cheney's place I am sure the first thing you would do is call the press and announce to the world that you were involved with a hunting accident.
L. Adams, Bloomington, IN (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:09:35 AM)
David,
I understand that you think you have certain rights and I hope that you understand I too feel I have certain rights to listen to other people that make a better effort to report the news, without total know it all analysis and obvious bias. You have endeared yourself to me to the extent that I no longer watch NBC. Please don't change networks so I don't have to change again.
Jim Talbott (Sent Feb 21, 2006 10:07:47 AM)
I agree Go David
I enjoyed reading the comments. Yes, Cheney has a responsibility to American to report things like this as soon as it happens and almost everything else in in life as long as he is a Office. And it is your responsibility to push just like you did. I just wish all of you had pushed as hard much sonner.
Art Deckard, Vancouver, Wa (Sent Feb 21, 2006 9:29:06 AM)
Why this story matters? It is symptomatic of an Administration that has caused me to lose my faith in America. Lost my faith in America. Let us not dance around the facts. This is a dangerous Admininstration in dangerous times producing dangerous results. Do we not, as American citizens, have the right to expect our proxies in the press to ask the hard questions, and demand truthful answers?
Keep on keepin' on David. Go get 'em.
Rick Browne, Crested Butte, Colorado (Sent Feb 21, 2006 9:05:18 AM)
I first heard of the shooting accident on TV I suppose. It wasn't relevant or even important except that Dick Cheney happens to be the US Vice president. When I heard all the carrying on and shenanigans of the press, I was as puzzled as I am about the carry on of the muslim world over the Mohammed cartoons: much ado about absolutely nothing. What were you thinking? It seems to me you were personally offended because the White House didn't call YOU, give you the exclusive they gave a small Corpus Christi newspaper. GET OVER IT. I even heard Maureen Dowd saying Cheney was undermining the most sacred of our liberties(namely the free press) How pompuous is that? And Peggy Noonan of all people asked for his resignation? You guys are really out of touch with reality.
Ana Martinez New York (Sent Feb 21, 2006 8:41:59 AM)
I just can't believe that a journalist, who see's himself as highly intelligent, would fall for such an obvious media trap. The hunting incident was indeed unfortunate. However, the release of the information to the press did exactly what it was supposed to do-it revealed to the American people just how sort-sighted you are when it comes to the Bush Administration. I would not be surprised at all that in the near future that other such incidents happen, and like lemmings, you rush over the side of the cliff to drown in a sea of your own bias. Actions such as yours only give politicians the ammunition they need to further discredit the media.
Ron S., charleston, SC (Sent Feb 21, 2006 8:33:16 AM)
I think it's time our reporters put the thumb screws to the politians. Why has the Bush Admins been controlling the media for so long? How come there are so many cover ups going on? How come Presidient Bush is getting away w/ high crimes against the nation who elected him into office? How come there are tax breaks for the rich people and corp. but the lower income folks suffer the worst with their programs being cut and a medicare medicine plan that only works for big insurance and pharm. companies.? How come our schools and teachers aren't receiving the funding they need but we still have the "no child left behind" law without the funding needed? How come Pres. Bush and his adminst. hasn't been charged with war crimes and human rights violations? How come President Bush is still in office with everything he's done wrong and the impeachment process hasn't even started? How come we have to ask these questions and no one else seems to think of these kind of questions or the need for some truthful and honest answers to what the Bush Adminst. is up to?
Diane Herrig, St. Petersburg, FL (Sent Feb 21, 2006 8:23:26 AM)
My view is that the problem with the press today is that it is not aggressive enough in pursuing and presenting information regarding government activity. There is little in depth analysis. "News" is confined to catchy headlines with no follow up
I can't imagine the kind of reporting that broke the Watergate story, taking place tioday
Christopher T. Drake. Sarasota Florida (Sent Feb 21, 2006 7:33:03 AM)
SEND A COMMENT
PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to this post, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.