Saddam, media militant
Saddam Hussein walked into court today, turned and smiled to reporters. It was a big toothy grin. It was clear from then, that we, not the court, were his target audience today. Throughout the day Saddam talked about the importance of world public opinion and the feelings of the Arab world. He seemed reluctant to talk about the events in Dujail, but he did want to talk, to re-invent himself, to make a transformation from captured dictator defeated by the Americans to a resistance leader, and Arab and Islamic hero. (It's no accident he has a Koran in his hand every time he wants into the courtroom.)
Covering the trial is historic and exciting, but it does feel a bit like we are watching animals in the zoo, seeing how they react when poked with sticks through the bars. There is a voyeuristic aspect that is disturbing and fascinating. One reporter joked, "I hope tomorrow they bring Saddam in like Hannibal Lecter, complete with face mask." Everyone laughed, because everyone I think secretly wished it would happen.
Editor's note: This is but one of the six, count 'em, six posts Richard filed today in NBC's latest contribution to the blogosphere: Blogging Baghdad: The Untold Story.
Read more from Richard Engel
Behind TSgt. Dana's story
TRACKBACKS
Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b0aa69e200d8346bdce453ef
This seems a rather poor start to Iraq's venture into Democracy. The Judge must take control of the proceedings in this courtroom, but, so far, that is not being done with the defendants calling the shots. Shouting matches between defendants and witnesses? Telling the judge to "go to hell?" No. No. Such behavior should land any defendant in a separate room where he can watch, but not disrupt, the proceedings via CCTV.
If Hussain insists on continuing his contumacious behavior, his threat to not return to the courtroom should be accepted. He can be afforded the ability to see-but-not-be-seen, especially if he refuses to control himself and his political outbursts. He has made his position with regard to the Court, the judges, and everything else relevant well known and "on the record." He has therefore preserved his rights to appeal the trial's result if he chooses, and there should be no tolerance for further antics. If he wishes to make further points in a civil and respectful manner that are related to the evidence as it is presented, that is one thing; making this a show-trial is not his option and the Court must take control and maintain the dignity and propriety of the process.
Pulling this mutt out of that hole only to provide him with a worldwide media stage to prance on will empower his supporters beyond measure.
Mark, New Jersey (Sent Dec 6, 2005 5:48:20 PM)
Richard,
I have been an avid fan of NBC news for as long as I can remember. I must say that I throughly look forward to your reports from Baghdad. Essentially - you are the man. Stay safe. Keep up the excellent work.
David Walker (Sent Dec 6, 2005 11:44:30 AM)
I hope Mr. Engel can answer this. Now that the US has killed many civilians, used chemicals in weapons during the bombing, paid papers to spin information, has secret prisons, doctored documents and with Mr. Cheney wanting torture for any prisoners. What crimes are we doing that are the same that Saddam is charged with. Its seems we're doing some of the same crimes.
Jackie Rawlings (Sent Dec 5, 2005 9:02:23 PM)
SEND A COMMENT
PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to this post, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.